HJR008 – Western Martingale

The purpose of this Joint Resolution would make an amendment to the constitution of Idaho, specifically updating the framework for managing state endowment & public lands. Key language changes include replacement of mandate language “maximum long-term financial return” and expands land management practices with ongoing revenue generation. The amendment also supports existing rights and obligations, as well as recognition of future opportunities as identified by state law. You can read the bill text here.

Background: Public lands, especially in Idaho, are under increased scrutiny following suggestions on a federal level in 2025 involving sale of such lands. With 66% of Idaho comprised of public lands, there are very passionate conversations related to protection of these spaces. While Idaho public lands are a mixture of federal and state managed lands, there is a significant impact to grazing permittees should sale of these lands be considered. Currently, the State Land Board (comprised of the Governor, Attorney General, State Controller, Superintendent of Education, and the Idaho Department of Lands Director) are constitutionally obligated to maximize return to the endowment – be it through grazing lease, recreation, or sale of these lands. This requirement has been the source of contest in recent years, as more scenarios are presented that focus on high value lands. This constitutional amendment would change the language that mandates the Land Board to make decisions on public lands solely based on maximizing return to the endowment, and instead consider long term revenue generation, as well as preserves existing options for timber, mining, and grazing.

Why is this important to cattle producers in Idaho?

Grazing on public lands is an important element of multiple use, for many reasons ranging from health of the landscape, benefit to wildlife and ability for cattle to take inedible to human forage and convert to a high-quality protein available to the American population. State land permittees depend on stability to their operation provided by long term leases. Additionally, while leases provide long term revenue generation to the endowment, there is inherent risk to producers that a potential high priced offer made to the state must be considered by the Land Board as part of its constitutional obligation, leaving out other management benefits, and operators without a lease.

Does ICA support this proposed bill?

ICA supports this Join Resolution, as it is in line with our member directed policy to protect public lands grazing rights.

How do I take action?

You can participate in one of the below actions to have an impact as an individual. ICA will continue to submit comments on issues as a representative of its members. Watch this page for opportunities to either sign on or submit individual comments.