This proposed legislation would make an amendment to the constitution of Idaho, specifically in regards to the management of state endowment lands. The amendment distinguishes between state endowment lands and public lands acquired from the federal government, with a stipulation that federally managed lands that may be endowed in the FUTURE will be placed in a trust which prohibits their sale. Additionally, these lands will be managed to promote balance in specific areas. You can read the bill text here.

Background: Public lands, especially in Idaho, are under increased scrutiny following suggestions on a federal level in 2025 involving sale of such lands. With 66% of Idaho comprised of public lands, there are very passionate conversations related to protection of these spaces. While Idaho public lands are a mixture of federal and state managed lands, there is a significant impact to grazing permittees should sale of these lands be considered. Currently, the State Land Board (comprised of the Governor, Attorney General, State Controller, Superintendent of Education, and the Idaho Department of Lands Director) are constitutionally obligated to maximize return to the endowment – be it through grazing lease, recreation, or sale of these lands. This constitutional amendment requires that lands acquired through land exchanges (Federal -> State) be set aside in a trust and managed differently than what is currently required by the endowment. Unfortunately, these stipulations do not explicitly include the protection of grazing as part of the balanced management, rather leaning to other elements of multiple use.

Why is this important to cattle producers in Idaho?

Grazing on public lands is an important element of multiple use, for many reasons ranging from health of the landscape, benefit to wildlife and ability for cattle to take inedible to human forage and convert to a high-quality protein available to the American population. Ranchers work hand in hand with agency on a regular basis.

Does ICA support this proposed bill?

No, ICA does not support this amendment, as it does not provide protections against a reduction in AUMs.

How do I take action?

You can participate in one of the below actions to have an impact as an individual. ICA will continue to submit comments on issues as a representative of its members. Watch this page for opportunities to either sign on or submit individual comments.